Someone made a comment about my entry of Wednesday August 24. The comment was related to where I said "God does not need anyone's money." The comment was to explain why the concept of tithing is so rampant.
Tithing today is an unintended con game by men who do not know their Bible, who may not want to know their Bible, and who Paul called "disorderly" in II Thessalonians 3:6-15.
To say that tithing is a requirement and that we should turn a tenth of our income over to our pastor in the offering plate we have to commit the blasphemy of saying that God changed his mind. First there are three tithes: the tithe for the festivals, the tithe to maintain the Levites and the temple and the tithe every three years for the poor. That's 23 1/3 percent. More important is that the Bible is quite clear that the tithe is to be paid to the Levites, the sons of Levi, who own nothing. Does your pastor claim to be a descendent of Levi? Does your pastor own any property in his own name? If he is so concerned about fulfilling the Bible, does he perform the required blood sacrifices at the altar? If he answers no to any of these questions, where is his scriptural basis to change the tithe to 10%, have it paid to him so that he does not have to get a job to support himself, and possibly use your tithe to buy luxuries for himself? If the duty of the Levite has been transferred to him why does he not do the other duties of the Levites that are closely tied to the tithing? What is his scriptural basis for doing the Levitical duty of collecting the tithes yet changing the requirement of owning nothing?
The Macedonians were desirous, quite possibly after much prayer, of giving money to Paul to aid in Jerusalem. There was no sermon of requirement to do so. We do not know the whole story but we do know that the Macedonians were poor and quite likely their own needs were met in ways that were miraculous but which could have been explained away as something that would have happened anyway.
Today I went to a hot air balloon festival in Loveland Colorado. I went with my daughter, her husband Matt, and the children Amber, age 10 and Jacob almost 2. We arrived early. Many people were already there. A truck with a balloon trailer arrived and parked right in front of us. The driver, a balloon pilot, did not see his ground crew. He asked for someone to help. Matt volunteered. The man could have waited for his crew or he could have searched for people who had already volunteered to help. Matt got in the truck and he and the pilot went to another part of the park. After watching a balloon ascend, Amber walked over to where Matt was helping. The pilot made an offer to take Amber in the balloon. There was himself and another adult. He did not have room for another adult due to weight yet he could take a child. Amber got her first balloon ride. Let's look closely at what happened.
1. Balloon rides were being offered for $200. This man was not selling rides because he was sponsored to display an ad.
2. There were volunteers already on a list to assist as volunteer ground crews.
3. This pilot happened to stop right in front of us. He needed help. There were 14 other pilots there.
4. Matt volunteered with no other motive than to be of assistance where he could. He gave of his ability to move things with his hands.
5. Matt was able to provide an opportunity for Amber that was worth $200 yet the pilot did not lose as he had already been paid.
6. Amber walked over to that balloon rather than staying with the rest of us. Normally she might not have done that. Had she not gone over to be with Matt the balloon pilot would not have known of her.
It is possible to explain away these circumstances as coincidence and chance. I believe that God provided a giving opportunity for both Matt and the balloon pilot. This is an example of God's type of giving. Matt could have easily paid for her seat but of all the 15 balloons a seat on this balloon was not for sale at any price.
This example also becomes a way of answering the person who made the comment.
David Sneed
Tithing today is an unintended con game by men who do not know their Bible, who may not want to know their Bible, and who Paul called "disorderly" in II Thessalonians 3:6-15.
To say that tithing is a requirement and that we should turn a tenth of our income over to our pastor in the offering plate we have to commit the blasphemy of saying that God changed his mind. First there are three tithes: the tithe for the festivals, the tithe to maintain the Levites and the temple and the tithe every three years for the poor. That's 23 1/3 percent. More important is that the Bible is quite clear that the tithe is to be paid to the Levites, the sons of Levi, who own nothing. Does your pastor claim to be a descendent of Levi? Does your pastor own any property in his own name? If he is so concerned about fulfilling the Bible, does he perform the required blood sacrifices at the altar? If he answers no to any of these questions, where is his scriptural basis to change the tithe to 10%, have it paid to him so that he does not have to get a job to support himself, and possibly use your tithe to buy luxuries for himself? If the duty of the Levite has been transferred to him why does he not do the other duties of the Levites that are closely tied to the tithing? What is his scriptural basis for doing the Levitical duty of collecting the tithes yet changing the requirement of owning nothing?
The Macedonians were desirous, quite possibly after much prayer, of giving money to Paul to aid in Jerusalem. There was no sermon of requirement to do so. We do not know the whole story but we do know that the Macedonians were poor and quite likely their own needs were met in ways that were miraculous but which could have been explained away as something that would have happened anyway.
Today I went to a hot air balloon festival in Loveland Colorado. I went with my daughter, her husband Matt, and the children Amber, age 10 and Jacob almost 2. We arrived early. Many people were already there. A truck with a balloon trailer arrived and parked right in front of us. The driver, a balloon pilot, did not see his ground crew. He asked for someone to help. Matt volunteered. The man could have waited for his crew or he could have searched for people who had already volunteered to help. Matt got in the truck and he and the pilot went to another part of the park. After watching a balloon ascend, Amber walked over to where Matt was helping. The pilot made an offer to take Amber in the balloon. There was himself and another adult. He did not have room for another adult due to weight yet he could take a child. Amber got her first balloon ride. Let's look closely at what happened.
1. Balloon rides were being offered for $200. This man was not selling rides because he was sponsored to display an ad.
2. There were volunteers already on a list to assist as volunteer ground crews.
3. This pilot happened to stop right in front of us. He needed help. There were 14 other pilots there.
4. Matt volunteered with no other motive than to be of assistance where he could. He gave of his ability to move things with his hands.
5. Matt was able to provide an opportunity for Amber that was worth $200 yet the pilot did not lose as he had already been paid.
6. Amber walked over to that balloon rather than staying with the rest of us. Normally she might not have done that. Had she not gone over to be with Matt the balloon pilot would not have known of her.
It is possible to explain away these circumstances as coincidence and chance. I believe that God provided a giving opportunity for both Matt and the balloon pilot. This is an example of God's type of giving. Matt could have easily paid for her seat but of all the 15 balloons a seat on this balloon was not for sale at any price.
This example also becomes a way of answering the person who made the comment.
David Sneed

